Denied Meal Breaks – San Diego Visa Immigration Lawyer

WE ARE THE LAW FIRM
THAT GETS THE JOB DONE.
PERIOD.

Lunch And Meal Break Laws In California

As of April 2012, the Supreme Court of California and San Diego employment law have ruled that workers are legally entitled to meal breaks.

According to California Labor Code § 226.7:
“No employer shall require any employee to work during any meal or rest period mandated by an applicable order of the Industrial Welfare Commission (IWC).”

This means that an employer who denies meal breaks to workers may be violating the law.

If an employer pressures an employee to work during a designated break, this may legally constitute a denial of that break. If you are an employer or employee, consult with us to determine where you stand regarding denied meal breaks.

We can answer any of your questions, including:

What is an unpaid meal break?

Antitrust legal actions have a long history in both America and California. If you believe that you—as a consumer or business owner—are being affected by a manipulated market, you may find legal protection under laws such as:

According to 29 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) § 785.18, a legal unpaid meal break must meet the following criteria:

The break must be at least 30 minutes and free from interruption.
The employee must be completely relieved of all work-related duties for at least 30 minutes.
The employer cannot dictate what the employee does or where they go during the break.
The employee must be able to take the break freely, without discouragement or repercussions from the employer.

These criteria define a legitimate meal break, during which an employee is not entitled to pay.

Additionally, some international authorities address cross-border antitrust violations. However, pursuing legal action against anti-competitive entities requires a trusted and experienced legal team you can rely on.

What is the meal break law in California?

San Diego employees must be allowed a 30-minute meal break for every five hours worked and a second 30-minute break if they work a 10-hour shift in one day.

According to California Labor Code § 512(a):
“In California, an employer may not employ an employee for a work period of more than five hours per day without providing the employee with a meal period of not less than thirty minutes, except that if the total work period per day of the employee is no more than six hours, the meal period may be waived by mutual consent of both the employer and employee. A second meal period of not less than thirty minutes is required if an employee works more than ten hours per day, except that if the total hours worked is not more than 12 hours, the second meal period may be waived by mutual consent of the employer and employee only if the first meal period was not waived.”

This means that meal breaks are mandatory, but certain waivers are allowed under specific conditions.

Can I work without a meal break?

The only situation in which an employer may offer a meal break waiver is when an employee is working a complete shift of no more than six hours. In this case, the employee may choose to sign a written waiver, voluntarily forgoing their 30-minute break.

If an employer encourages or pressures an employee to waive their meal break for a shift exceeding six hours, the employer is liable for violating San Diego employment law.

An employee can only forgo a meal break if they do so voluntarily, without coercion, and must be compensated at their regular rate for any work performed during the break period.

Do I have to take a meal break at work?

According to the California Department of Industrial Relations:

“If the employer requires the employee to remain at the work site or facility during the meal period, the meal period must be paid. This is true even where the employee is relieved of all work duties during the meal period.”

This means that if an employer restricts an employee’s ability to leave the workplace during their meal break, the break must be considered paid time, even if the employee is not performing any work-related tasks.

Can I sue my work for forcing me to work during my meal break without compensation?

If an employer forces a worker to take an on-duty meal break, fails to compensate them for this time, and does not allow the employee to revoke the agreement to accept an on-duty meal break, the employer is liable for violating San Diego employment law.

If you are an employer facing these charges or an employee who has been wrongly denied your right to a break, it is strongly advised that you contact a San Diego employment lawyer to assist you with your case.

Failure To Provide Employee Lunch Breaks

If an employer fails to meet any of these criteria when providing a meal break, they may be liable for violating San Diego labor law.

Even if an employer has a company policy that allows for 30-minute, uninterrupted, and unsupervised meal periods, they cannot legally encourage an employee to work during that time.

If you are involved in a case regarding denied meal breaks, it is strongly recommended that you contact an employment lawyer with detailed knowledge of San Diego labor law.

On-Duty Meal Breaks In California

In certain circumstances, an on-duty meal break can be legal, even if an employee is working more than five hours per day. This type of meal break is defined under California Code of Regulations, Title 8, § 11040.

Legal Definition of an On-Duty Meal Break

According to Industrial Welfare Commission (IWC) Orders 1-15, Section 11, and Order 16, Section 10:
“Unless the employee is relieved of all duty during his or her thirty-minute meal period, the meal period shall be considered an ‘on-duty’ meal period that is counted as hours worked, which must be compensated at the employee’s regular rate of pay. An ‘on-duty’ meal period shall be permitted only when the nature of the work prevents an employee from being relieved of all duty and when, by written agreement between the employer and employee, an on-the-job paid meal period is agreed to. The written agreement must state that the employee may, in writing, revoke the agreement at any time. The test of whether the nature of the work prevents an employee from being relieved of all duty is an objective one. An employer and employee may not agree to an on-duty meal period unless, based on objective criteria, an employee would be prevented from being relieved of all duty due to necessary job duties. Some examples of jobs that fit this category include a sole worker in a coffee kiosk, a sole worker in an all-night convenience store, and a security guard stationed alone at a remote site.”

Employer Requirements for On-Duty Meal Breaks

Employers may require employees to remain on work premises during meal breaks. However, since employees do not have full freedom over their time, these breaks are considered on-duty meal periods and must be compensated at the regular rate of pay.
If an employer requires an employee to stay on work premises, a suitable facility must be provided for workers to eat.
According to IWC wage orders, suitable facilities must include a:
- Sheltered area
- Space for serving or heating food and drinks
- Area for consuming food and beverages

Legal Rights of Employees Regarding On-Duty Meal Breaks

Employers cannot force employees to take an on-duty meal break. Workers may legally request coverage for their duties during a standard meal break.
Employers will not be penalized if an employee willingly signs an agreement accepting an on-duty meal break.
An employee remains on the clock for an on-duty meal period and may be entitled to overtime pay as a result.
If an employee agrees to an on-duty meal break, they can revoke this agreement at any time and legally demand a full meal break, completely relieved of all work-related responsibilities.

Potential Violations of San Diego Labor Law

An employer may be in violation of San Diego labor law if they:

Fail to compensate employees for on-duty meal breaks.
Require employees to remain on-site but fail to provide adequate facilities for meals.

If you believe your meal break rights have been violated or you are an employer seeking legal guidance, contact an experienced San Diego employment lawyer for assistance.

Meal Breaks That Violate San Diego Employment Law

Some employers may attempt to avoid providing meal breaks for employees working six-hour shifts or longer. In many cases, an employer may be violating San Diego employment law by pressuring or forcing an employee to take an on-duty meal break in a job that, under legal review, would not qualify for one.

For example, a clerk in a retail store, working standard operating hours, cannot legally be denied an off-duty break simply because the employer does not want to pay another employee to cover for them. If you believe your job does not require you to take an on-duty meal break, consult a San Diego employment lawyer.

Waiving the Right to a Meal Break

An employer may also attempt to convince or pressure an employee to waive their meal break. While this is allowed if the employee is working exactly six hours, it is illegal for an employer to coerce a worker into waiving their meal break for a shift of six or more hours.

For employees working more than six hours, even a signed waiver will be invalid in court, and the employer may be held liable for violating San Diego labor laws.

Meal Breaks During Unconventional Hours

Meal breaks taken at unconventional times have specific legal regulations to ensure they are legitimate.

According to IWC Orders:
“If a meal period occurs on a shift beginning or ending at or between the hours of 10 p.m. and 6 a.m., facilities must be available for securing hot food and drink or for heating food or drink, and a suitable sheltered place must be provided in which to consume such food or drink.”

This means that employees must be provided with a safe, easily accessible space to take a meal break if they are required to do so at night or during early morning hours. Failing to provide such a space may be considered a violation of San Diego employment law.

If you are an employee required to take a meal break during overnight hours and are not given an appropriate space, consult a San Diego labor lawyer.
If you are an employer facing unfair accusations regarding meal break accommodations, you should also seek legal counsel.

Illegal Meal Break Scheduling Practices

It is a violation of San Diego employment law for an employer to schedule a meal break at the very beginning or end of a shift.

For example, if an employee works from 12 p.m. to 8 p.m., the employer cannot:

Force the employee to take a meal break at 12 p.m. (right when they start).
Schedule the meal break at 7:30 p.m., just before sending them home early.

This practice denies employees a legitimate break, preventing them from resting and eating a meal during their workday. Employers found guilty of this violation may face legal consequences under San Diego labor laws.

Liability During Unpaid Meal Breaks

If an employer meets all legal requirements for providing an unpaid meal break, during which the employee is completely relieved of all work-related duties and is free to leave the premises, the employer is unlikely to be held liable for anything that happens to the worker during the break.

For example, if an employee leaves work premises to eat a meal and is involved in a car accident, the employer is generally not liable for damages. However, this outcome is not guaranteed, and legal responsibility may vary depending on the circumstances. If you face this issue as an employer or employee, consult a San Diego labor lawyer to discuss the potential outcome of your case.

Employer Liability for On-Duty Meal Breaks

If an employer encourages or requires an employee to take an on-duty meal break while still performing work-related duties, the employer may be liable for any accidents or incidents that occur during that break.
An employer may also be liable if the conditions of an unpaid meal break are deemed unsafe. For example, requiring an employee to take a meal break at an unorthodox or potentially unsafe time of day or night could create liability issues.

Illegal or Prohibited Activity During Meal Breaks

If an employee engages in illegal or prohibited activity during an unpaid meal break, the employer is unlikely to be held liable—unless the employer instructed or encouraged the worker to engage in the illegal activity.
If illicit activity occurs during a meal break, the employer will likely have the right to terminate the worker’s employment without legal repercussions.
Employers and employees should also be aware that consuming alcohol during meal breaks or at any time during working hours is illegal and may result in liability and/or termination.

Legal Assistance for Meal Break Liability

If you are a worker who has experienced an accident during a meal break, speak to a San Diego labor lawyer to determine whether your employer may be liable.
If you are an employer facing a lawsuit over unpaid meal break liability, an experienced San Diego employment lawyer will be essential in proving whether you were responsible for what occurred during the break.

Compensation For Denied Meal Breaks

According to California Labor Code § 226.7:

“If an employer fails to provide an employee a meal period or rest period in accordance with an applicable order of the Industrial Welfare Commission, the employer shall pay the employee one additional hour of pay at the employee’s regular rate of compensation for each workday that the meal or rest period is not provided.”

This means that if an employer does not provide a legally required meal or rest break, they must compensate the employee with one additional hour of pay at their regular rate for each workday the break is denied.

For example, if an employee earning $8 per hour works an eight-hour shift and does not receive a meal break, the employer must compensate the worker with an additional $8 for each day the meal break is denied.

If an employee is entitled to two meal breaks for working a 10-hour shift or longer, the same compensation applies—the employee is still entitled to pay for an additional hour of work. This is because the penalty is calculated per day, not per missed break.

Legal Consequences for Employers & Employee Rights

If you are an employee who has been denied your right to an unpaid meal break while relieved of all duties, or an employer who has been wrongly accused of violating these laws, contact a San Diego labor lawyer immediately.

Failing to meet meal break requirements is likely to be considered a violation of San Diego employment law in court. This can lead to serious legal consequences for employers and substantial compensation for employees.

If You’re Denied Your Break, You Have Options. Call Us.

Keep in mind that if an employee is denied a meal break, they may also be entitled to overtime compensation.

For example, if an employee works an 8.5-hour shift each day and misses a meal break due to a busy workplace or because no one is available to cover their duties, they are entitled to:

An additional hour’s pay for the missed meal break.
Overtime compensation for the extra half-hour worked.

For a minimum wage employee in San Diego, this means they would receive overtime pay of $6 for the additional half-hour worked.

Employer Liability for Unpaid Overtime & Meal Break Violations

Failing to properly compensate employees who miss meal breaks and are owed overtime pay is a violation of San Diego labor law.

If you need legal assistance, call our office at (800) 637-6178.

Legal Consequences for Employers & Employee Rights

Address

Connect